
Voyager 2 passed close to Uranus’ moon Miranda in January 1986. Notice the two race tacks, one deeply grooved and the other fuzzier. In the center are multiple chevron valleys. One side of the chevrons has a deep valley that winds past the apex of the chevron. It continues to a steep valley and precipitous mountain range outlined against the shadow of space. Other, less pronounced, sinuous rilles run across the pockmarked surface. Some scientists suggested that the moon was hit, and the pieces reorganized in a jumbled fashion. (Click on the image to see an expanded version). Yet no large crater is visible. Others suggested that during the freezing process, thermal up welling scrambled the surface. On earth we find long parallel cracks in sea ice. Repeated thawing and freezing creates angular cracks and strange patterns. We also see parallel features and perpendicular transform valleys along the great undersea expansion seam that passes through every ocean. How could a frozen Uranian moon repeatedly warm and re freeze? How could it have tectonic features like earth?
Perhaps Miranda has not always been far from the Sun. Ptolemy, 1850 years ago, measured larger angular diameters for the planets. Many ancient and modern astronomers measured a decreasing solar parallax throughout the centuries. On earth, the continents only fit together on a tiny globe. The continents are rooted, apparently staying in place relative to the center, while the sea floor continues to spread. Fresh basaltic flows, parallel magnetic stripes and the thickness of the sea sediments attest to spreading ocean floors. The notion that the earth swallows this basalt (subduction) is denied by the layered undisturbed sediments in the ‘subduction trenches’. Evidently the primordial earth was a minuscule planet.
The major impediment to belief in an expanding earth is, What mechanism could cause earth expansion? The Hebrew text of the Bible clearly states that the earth spreads out in unbroken continuity. The simplest answer is to believe one’s eyes, that matter is changing as a relation. Relational changes are where everything shifts in parallel, together. We can compare ancient matter with modern atoms at many ranges throughout cosmic history. Not a single one of the billions of ancient galaxies shines with the light of perpetual motion atoms. Yet all scientists define their measuring units with the assumption that atoms dither with perpetual motion.
The most powerful evidence for the continuous changes in atoms is the visible history of the universe, how the galaxies formed. The stars accelerated outward from naked globs, spreading out into huge, local, dusty growth spirals. Billions of galaxies grew in size as the stars accelerated outward concurrently with the accelerating atomic clocks. What is visible is only possible if the properties of matter emerge, change as a relation. Miranda, like the earth, has a complex geology partly because the properties of matter are not fixed. Neither atoms nor orbits are clock like. The amount of space atoms take up, their light clocks and their inertial properties keep on visibly changing throughout cosmic history.
Why can’t we measure relational changes in atoms? The scientific definitions of time and matter are tied to their concept of perpetually unchanging atoms. When atoms change as a relation, the measuring units and mathematical formulas would track with the changing matter. Both sides of a scale would keep changing equally so that the same objects, over time, would remain in balance. In such a universe, constants are synthetic, not actual. The worst kind of error is an error at the level of a historical first principle.
Photo credit NASA and wikipedia.org



