How do giant stars form?

Scientific cosmologies begin with a simple, yet pervasive, article of faith: the assumption that the properties of matter are not emergent. Scientists have faith that matter is not changing its properties as a relationship: it does not intrinsically and continually change its internal structure and motions together - in an orderly way. Scientists are trained to think with this assumption since it is the historical basis of their way of thinking, measuring, mathematicating. The earliest form of this assumption was invented by a pagan Greek more than 2300 years ago. It became the basis of the Western system when the Catholic universities of Europe began to teach Aristotle's metaphysics alongside the Bible.

We can see the past when we accumulate dim light from many parts of the spectrum. Not a single distant galaxy shines with the identical light frequencies of modern atoms. In general, the more ancient (distant) the light, the more it shines with minuscule ratios of local light frequencies. Despite this overwhelming evidence, from hundreds of billions of galaxies, scientists interpret the universe with their laws of physics, which presuppose the creed of all scientists.

For example, they conjecture that stars were formed from thin vacuous clouds. Supposedly some parts of the vacuous cloud were a little denser than others so they had slightly more 'gravity.' This caused the thinnest gasses to fall in toward the denser parts. This had a positive feedback effect, aggregating larger clouds until eventually they became so dense that fusion began. Fusion caused the stars to start spewing out streams of particles. The outflow from fusion pressures should prevent more gases from falling in. Therefore there should not be any supergiant stars. Here is a picture of the supergiant star Eta Carinae It ejected great hot clouds of gases during ancient times.



Scientists don't accept the simple, visible, optical history of the universe. Instead they seek for complex mathematical explanations, using their presumption that the properties of matter are not emergent. They often build complex computer models and run them to find 'solutions'. In the case of the giant stars, Mark Krumholz from University of California , Santa Cruz ran a super computer for months. According to his mathematical simulations, stars develop channels where radiation is blowing out material even as gas continues to fall in through other channels. Some of these channels allegedly can develop companion stars. In falling channels are mathematical entities, not visible ones.

According to the Bible, at first the heavens and the earth were formless until God commanded light to be. Matter and its form were actualized by light. The forming of the stars did not occur until the fourth day / night cycle. At that point God continually placed the Sun, Moon and stars in the raqiya, the spreading out place. The Hebrew Bible repeatedly states that the stars continually come out, spread out, take up more volume. We see that ancient galaxies were dense with tiny stars. We see at many ranges how little globs packed with stars moved out, accelerated out, spread out as billions of galaxies grew into huge growth spirals. The properties of matter are always observed to change throughout cosmic history. All clocks, atomic and orbital, are observed to always accelerate throughout cosmic history. Biblical physics is based on the biblical principle that everything in the universe is phthora, fundamentally changing. Biblical physics is confirmed with sight, not mathematical simulations. Despite the visible evidence, scientists build their cosmologies on the assumption that atoms are perpetual motion machines. It is not surprising that the scientific cosmos is 99% invisible, crammed full of invisible magic. Scientists only know how to think and measure with their assumption that the properties of matter are not emergent. Look at the heavens and see with your eyes how the God of the Bible will vanquish science!